Scholar Profile · Management & Strategy

Business Process Reengineering

Davenport & Hammer · 1990 · Dynamic Interaction

Improve cost, quality, service & speed — by redesigning from zero.

Begin the walk↓
Room I
The Person

Michael Hammer (1948–2008), an MIT computer scientist, declared 'don't automate, obliterate' in a 1990 HBR article; with consultant James Champy he turned reengineering into the management wave of the early 1990s. Thomas Davenport (b. 1954) offered the more measured process-innovation account — and later the most honest critique of the fad.

Room II
The Idea in Context

BPR urged radical redesign of end-to-end processes rather than incremental improvement. Powerful where applied well; in practice, often a synonym for downsizing — a cautionary tale about tools divorced from values.

The era: Dynamic Interaction — A dynamic, interactive influence process among individuals in groups; emphasis on managing environmental cross points.

Room III
The Big Idea
The Enduring Contribution
The last great purely rationalist management wave before complexity thinking arrived.

Improve cost, quality, service & speed — by redesigning from zero.

Room IV
Landmark Works
1993
Hammer & Champy, Reengineering the Corporation
Landmark Work
Room V
In the Discourse

This theory sits in the Dynamic Interaction era of the map: A dynamic, interactive influence process among individuals in groups; emphasis on managing environmental cross points.

1990
Systems Thinking
1995
Ethics Turn
Room VI
In Practice

Redesign end-to-end processes around customer value, not departmental convenience.

Pair radical redesign with radical honesty about the human cost.

Room VII
Reflection Gallery
Which process would you never design the way it currently runs?
Is 'transformation' here a design or a euphemism?
Room VIII
Sources & Further Reading
← Return to the Discourse Map Next in the Discourse: Margaret Wheatley →