Opposites can be partially integrated through dynamic, context-sensitive balancing.
Peter Ping Li is a management scholar known for developing geocentric approaches that bring indigenous Chinese thought into conversation with Western management research.
Li’s Yin–Yang balancing framework challenges rigid either/or assumptions without collapsing meaningful differences. It treats opposing elements as partially conflicting and partially complementary, with their relationship changing across context and time.
This work is mapped within the Paradox lineage: relational roots → organizational tensions → exploration and exploitation → polarity management → structural ambidexterity → formal paradox theory → contemporary both/and practice.
Explore the Both/And module →Where are you assuming two traditions cannot inform one another?
What contextual shift would require a different balance?